*Please read the post labeled "PLEASE READ" before posting a comment.
There seems to be many positions within the KJV only argument that some "KJV only groups" (for lack of a better title) hold to and others do not. For example, some groups believe that the KJV replaces the original Greek/Hebrew/Aramaic writings while others do not. Some groups claim that salvation cannot occur unless the KJV is used, but others allow for different translations to be used. Some argue that the KJV is perfect, and others say it is the closest to perfect that we have in English. The list goes on.
The Question: If there are so many positions in the KJV only scene, which ones are right? Any of these groups are convinced that they are right, but they cannot all be right.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'd say none of them are right; I disagree that KJV is the only version, and I certainly think it's silly to try to replace the original writings with KJV. Hearing a preacher say KJV is the only version is an instant turnoff for me. (Yet another reason I left PCC).
ReplyDelete-em